The taking pictures of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in December 2024, the place a 3D-printed gun was used, highlights the escalating menace of those untraceable “ghost weapons.”
These firearms, made partially or solely with commercially accessible 3D printers, are more and more showing in felony exercise, posing important challenges for legislation enforcement and policymakers worldwide. The U.S. Supreme Courtroom is at the moment reviewing the legality of federal restrictions on these weapons.
The primary documented felony case involving a 3D-printed gun occurred within the UK in 2013. Since then, their prevalence has grown quickly. Between 2017 and 2021, U.S. legislation enforcement seized almost 38,000 suspected ghost weapons, in line with a 2024 US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives report.
In 2021 alone, over 19,000 have been traced, a pointy rise from simply over 8,500 in 2020. New York state noticed a dramatic enhance from 100 seizures in 2019 to 637 in 2022. Arrests are additionally on the rise, with 108 globally within the first half of 2023, in comparison with 66 in all of 2022.
North America leads in 3D-printed gun-related arrests (166 from 2013 to June 2023), adopted by Europe (48) and Oceania (24). The U.S. accounts for 36% of worldwide arrests in 2023, carefully adopted by Canada (34%). The UK and Australia signify 10% and eight% respectively.
In accordance with a report in The Dialog, these weapons have been linked to a variety of teams, together with far-right extremists, ethno-separatists, jihadists, left-wing anarchists, organised crime, and pro-democracy rebels. From 2019 to mid-2022, no less than 9 circumstances in Europe and Australia concerned extremists, terrorists, or paramilitary teams trying or succeeding in producing 3D-printed firearms. Evaluation of 165 circumstances from 2013 to mid-2024 reveals that 15% have been terrorism-related, with far-right teams being essentially the most frequent customers.
The shortage of serial numbers on these do-it-yourself weapons makes them tough to hint, a key attraction for criminals. International regulatory approaches range considerably.
Japan strictly prohibits unauthorised firearm manufacturing, together with 3D-printed weapons, with extreme penalties. Canada successfully banned ghost weapons in 2023, requiring licenses for possession or manufacture. Australia criminalises each making and, in some states, possessing blueprints for 3D-printed firearms, with potential jail sentences of as much as 21 years. The EU broadly prohibits making or proudly owning do-it-yourself firearms, with various legal guidelines and penalties, together with criminalising possession of digital information. The UK not too long ago up to date its legal guidelines to particularly ban possessing, shopping for, or producing components for 3D-printed weapons, and is contemplating banning blueprint possession.
Within the U.S., the Second Modification and First Modification pose distinctive regulatory challenges. Whereas promoting 3D-printed firearms requires a federal license, producing or proudly owning them for private use is permitted, together with 3D-printing the decrease receiver. Present federal legislation, underneath Supreme Courtroom overview, requires 3D-printed gun kits to fulfill particular pointers, together with licensing, background checks, and serial numbers. Changing semi-automatic firearms into computerized weapons utilizing 3D-printed “Glock switches” is against the law and carries important penalties.
State-level rules are additionally rising. By November 2024, 15 U.S. states had applied rules on ghost weapons, usually requiring serial numbers, background checks, and reporting of 3D-printed firearm manufacturing. For instance, New Jersey mandates serial numbers and registration, whereas New York is contemplating making 3D-printed firearm manufacturing a felony.
As 3D printing expertise advances, the problem of regulating these weapons and mitigating the menace they pose to public security will seemingly intensify.
Â
